Leonard Leo is a prominent figure in the conservative movement, particularly known for his influence on judicial appointments and shaping the U.S. judiciary. As a key strategist for the Federalist Society, he has played a crucial role in the selection of conservative judges, including Supreme Court justices who contributed to landmark decisions, such as the overturning of Roe v. Wade.

Leo's financial resources, reportedly exceeding a billion dollars, enable him to significantly impact political landscapes and conservative initiatives. He is heavily involved in Project 2025, which aims to restructure the federal government according to Christian nationalist principles. This initiative seeks to dismantle various social rights, promote religious institutions, and redefine policies on issues like LGBTQ+ rights and abortion.

Through his efforts, Leo aims to embed conservative values within the federal government, leveraging his extensive network and financial backing to drive a far-reaching conservative agenda that could reshape American society and governance.

Leonard Leo secured a historic $1.6 billion donation for his legal network through an introduction facilitated by the Federalist Society. This donation is believed to be the largest political contribution ever recorded.

Leo met Barre Seid, a manufacturing magnate, through Eugene Meyer, the director of the Federalist Society, who initially envisioned Seid as a supporter of the society. However, Leo successfully cultivated Seid as a donor for his own dark money operations. This arrangement raises concerns about the close ties between the Federalist Society, which claims to be a nonpartisan educational organization, and Leo's activist network.

The significant funding from Seid is expected to bolster Leo's efforts to reshape conservative activism in the U.S., with a focus on policies that align with Christian nationalist principles. Leo's network has also funneled millions into the Federalist Society, highlighting a symbiotic relationship that blurs the lines between nonprofit advocacy and political activism. Critics within the society express concerns that Leo's activities could undermine its reputation and mission.